Or why Lucky Luciano is a better baby-sitter for your kids than any African tyrant…<\/strong><\/p>\n In part 2 of this series, School of Vice described an academic theory called Hobson-Leninism.\u00a0 The theory describes what the industrial societies of white Europe are supposedly to have done during the colonial period; that is they took advantage of far off places in native black or brown lands, stripped them of natural resources, abused the indigenous population; and essentially do to those of a darker complexion what whites do everywhere\u2026exploit the land and the people.\u00a0 The theory itself is not all that important.\u00a0 What happened to the theory is important. It was and is used to inculcate guilt in the dominant white majorities of Europe and North America.\u00a0 Like other theories that fall under the umbrella term Cultural Marxism, it has no validity just like its parent doctrine of Economic Marxism has no validity.\u00a0 It is based in a fabrication about how things are supposed to work, not how they do work.<\/p>\n Briefly, Marxism supposedly found the underlying rules by which society operates, namely class conflict with the working class or proletariat pitted against the ownership class or bourgeoisie.\u00a0 According to the theorists, once the rules were understood, mechanisms could be instituted to eliminate conflict, the inequalities of society eliminated, and all social pathologies alleviated.\u00a0 But, and this is a really big but, there are no underlying rules governing human affairs like there are rules governing the natural world (1).\u00a0 They simply are not there.\u00a0 There are no rules governing the affairs of men like there are physical laws governing the motion of planets.\u00a0 Social scientists have been looking for generations and have failed miserably in the attempt.\u00a0 And when faced with failure over and over and over again?\u00a0\u00a0 What do all bad scientists do? \u2026 Make something up.\u00a0 Force the issue.\u00a0 And how does one force the issue?\u00a0 Try to change how people think.\u00a0 Subject them to re-education and propaganda.\u00a0 Substitute other values for innate values in the effort to achieve desired societal change.<\/p>\n The desire for social change requires both a product and a method.\u00a0 The product is a group of academic theories, known as Critical Theory, derived from Economic Marxism.\u00a0 Hobson-Leninism is only one such theory.\u00a0 Others include:<\/p>\n Methods for social change are instituted by the political Left.\u00a0 The method is the advocacy and application of Critical Theory for the achievement of societal change.\u00a0 Its ideas have been employed by the political Left in both Europe and the North America since at least the 1960\u2019s.\u00a0 Becoming pervasive throughout academia, Critical Theory dominates departments in the social sciences and the humanities; Gender Studies and Whiteness Studies are just two such examples.\u00a0 The most vigorous application is seen in academia itself by inculcating certain attitudes and reinforcing the ideas thru minting new academics who toe the Critical Theory line without question.\u00a0 Other applications are seen in the main-stream media and Hollywood through constant repetition of ideas and themes.\u00a0 One of the main staples of Critical Theory is the demonization of oppressors and advocacy for the oppressed.\u00a0 This demonization, in fact, is the main theme amongst this group of theories.\u00a0 It is meant to undermine the dominant social group of Europe and North America, namely white, Christian, straight males and to a lesser extent females.\u00a0 Attack the basic underlying assumptions of this class of people.\u00a0 Whether it\u2019s the relationship between the sexes, gender identity, family, race or religion, every aspect of a person\u2019s identity is put under scrutiny and called into question.<\/p>\n People in general have natural affinities towards family, religion and patriotism.\u00a0 Application of Critical Theory seeks to substitute new values by demonizing the old.\u00a0\u00a0 Every norm of society is questioned and ideally altered, in an effort to help supposedly oppressed groups.\u00a0 Classical Marxism pitted the bourgeoisie against the proletariat or the-haves versus the-have-nots.\u00a0 Cultural Marxism pits a supposedly oppressive white culture against perceived oppressed groups, frequently defined as minorities.\u00a0 Traditional attitudes towards sex, family, patriotism, and religion are made pathologic and replaced by non-traditional phenomenon including transgenderism and multiculturalism.\u00a0 Traditional views are characterized as irrational fears or phobias like Islamophobia or homophobia.\u00a0 Never mind Muslims and homosexuals have their own preferred affinities.\u00a0 Their affinities are equal to or superior to other affinities and guilt is the emotional lever by which the substitution is made.\u00a0 Likewise, changing the meaning of words can be seen as controlling the terms by which these topics are discussed.\u00a0 In short, induce feelings of guilt where none existed before to leverage in substitute values.<\/p>\n Cultural Marxism, like Economic Marxism, denies individual free will and is deterministic; that is, people\u2019s behavior is supposedly governed by rules they are not aware of and denies individuality and the free choices that come with it.\u00a0 It creates artificial classes of people, namely the oppressed and the oppressors.\u00a0 Which brings us to neo-colonialism (or post-colonialism) as a part of Cultural Marxism. \u00a0In the current semantic milieu, colonial powers were the oppressors and the indigenous population the oppressed.\u00a0 And after decolonization?\u00a0 Everyone is free, right?\u00a0\u00a0 There are no more oppressing oppressors to victimize the oppressed, correct?\u00a0 Wrong!\u00a0 According to the theorists, continued economic stagnation and endless tribal conflict is a result not of the inherent backwardness of tribalism but of neo-colonialism where African countries experience continued victimization by white Europeans and North Americans (2).\u00a0\u00a0 Not surprisingly, this dynamic was never ascribed to the Soviets or Cubans and their influence on the continent.<\/p>\n Colonization happened.\u00a0 Then decolonization happened.\u00a0 Decolonization happened in the aftermath of World War II.\u00a0 It happened in India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Indochina, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa.\u00a0 As a rule, the United States supported the idea of national self-determination in contrast to the goals and desires of the other victorious Allied powers.\u00a0 The Soviets were eager to exploit British economic depletion and carve-up its Empire (3).\u00a0 Franklin Roosevelt was too weak-kneed to resist Stalin\u2019s demands (Roosevelt was similarly weak-kneed in giving away eastern and central Europe).\u00a0 Likewise, because of economic depletion and political turmoil at home, the French lost control of Indochina and territories in North Africa over time.\u00a0 Violent sectarianism was the name of the game at the local level.\u00a0 When colonial authority broke down or withdrew, local rivalries which had been long subdued boiled to the surface.\u00a0 The birth of India, Pakistan, Algeria and dozens of African nations was bought with the blood of thousands, and not simply indigenous people fighting Imperial troops in an effort to get them to leave.\u00a0 Oh, no, no, no.\u00a0 Sectarian fighting amongst the indigenous people for pent-up historical and cultural reasons spilled over; and, to jockey for supremacy after colonial administration went home. There is a general rule in history that no freedoms are won without some degree of struggle or conflict to the point of bloodshed. \u00a0But, what to do after political freedom is won?\u00a0 That is the central disgrace.<\/p>\n African politics continues to be dominated by tribalism.\u00a0 Transplanted Western political institutions are a faint patina layered over inherent tribalism.\u00a0 Western institutions like constitutionalism, the rule of law, and administrative systems were brought to Africa by colonial powers in the nineteenth century, most notably Britain.\u00a0 This illustrates the differing approaches to Imperial rule by the various powers.\u00a0\u00a0 Western political institutions were not organically developed within Africa over hundreds of years like they were in Europe and North America.\u00a0 These Western institutions paper-over local phenomenon like inter-tribal warfare, witchcraft, polygyny, sexual slavery, and child labor; things the West left behind centuries and millennia ago.\u00a0 In fact, Western colonialism suppressed some of the more primitive urges amongst the native population namely chattel slavery and child marriage, particularly in the Muslim lands of North Africa.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, during decolonization the philosophy of government was based on the pseudo-scientific economic theory of Hobson-Leninism.\u00a0 It became the prevailing wisdom of nation formation (4).\u00a0 In short, according to Johnson, \u201cWhat the system produced\u2026was a crop of professional politicians, all concealing deep tribal affiliations beneath a veneer of European-style ideology.\u201d\u00a0 So, while talking the talk of Western traditions, the African politicians could only walk the walk of tribalism.\u00a0 The result over the last few decades has been nothing short of a disaster; cronyism, graft, and the reign of gangster-caudillo-cult-like leaders across the entire continent.\u00a0 As an example, with decolonization mostly completed by the end of the 1960\u2019s, African countries had experienced 64 military coups, attempted coups and mutinies across sub-Saharan Africa.\u00a0 One need only look at similar summaries of political change each year in Africa to note, this pattern repeating itself almost continuously ever since.<\/p>\n Next up\u2026The Long, Slow March to Idiocy concludes with Part 4.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Or why Lucky Luciano is a better baby-sitter for your kids than any African tyrant…<\/strong><\/p>\n In part 2 of this series, School of Vice described an academic theory called Hobson-Leninism.\u00a0 The theory describes what the industrial societies of white Europe are supposedly to have done during the colonial period; that is they took advantage of far off places in native black or brown lands, stripped them of natural resources, abused the indigenous population; and essentially do…… <\/p>\n\n
\n